Blogs » Society » Leftwing Religionists Applaud Godless Socialism But Not enough

Leftwing Religionists Applaud Godless Socialism But Not enough

  • Episode 41 of the Commonweal Magazine podcast addresses the topic of “White Churches & White Supremacy”.

     

    The discussion consists of this leftwing Catholic outfit interviewing Robert P. Jones, a Southern Baptist wracked with White guilt, about his book “White Too Long: The Legacy Of White Supremacy In Christian America".

     

    In the discussion, it is revealed that the title is taken from a quote by writer James Baldwin.

     

    Isn't that itself an act of cultural misappropriation?

     

    If we are to buy into the premise that White Christians are guilty for deeds from the past deemed by Woketopians as racist on the part of organized religion, why shouldn't Baldwin and his contemporary acolytes be held responsible for the bloodshed, death, and destruction of property linked to the socialist ideology of which Baldwin was a proponent?

     

    And if the correspondents at Commonweal and Robert P. Jones want to invoke admiration for James Baldwin in their crusade against “White Christians”, don't they owe it to their readers to explain why they are downplaying or even concealing the ultimate conclusion of Baldwin's ratiocination that the concept of God should be abandoned altogether?

     

    If Christians are to derive their social philosophy from thinkers that deny the existence of God, why are we to side with those advocating revolutionary upheaval over those such as Ayn Rand or Milton Friedman that advocated a more individualistic approach to life?

     

    After all, in a world without God, no set of ideas is ultimately superior to any other.

     

    Could it be that, unlike Baldwin to the acclaim of critics, these propagandists do not have the creative wherewithal to continue their scam without what would be considered a crutch or opiate of the masses if they were being more philosophically honest about the worldview that it is that these alleged intellectuals actually profess?

     

    By Frederick Meekins