John R. Houk, Blog Editor
September 21, 2023
When you hear or see this terminology on TV or some form of digital print: “Trust the science” or “Safe and Effective”. The odds are you are witnessing brainwash lies being jammed down your thought processes! BELOW ARE A COUPLE OF CRITICAL THINKING SCIENCE shares that I pray leads you to reject science brainwashing. Particularly in regard to mRNA Jab science.
JRH 9/21/23
READER SUPPORTED!
Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my wife’s Online store: My Store (please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
***********************
90% of “COVID” deaths in past year occurred in fully or triple vaccinated individuals
Natural News Telegram Photo
September 20, 2023 5:05:50 PM
Post Link: https://t.me/NaturalNewsMedia/4971
The latest data out of England shows that a whopping nine out of 10 Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths in the past year occurred in people who were fully, or triple, “vaccinated.”
An astounding 91 percent of all COVID deaths in the United Kingdom since the beginning of 2022 occurred in people whom the government promised were “protected” against the Fauci Flu. Even worse, 94 percent of all COVID deaths since April 2022 have been in the fully jabbed.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS), a UK government agency, published a dataset on July 6 of this year covering deaths based on vaccination status up to May 31, 2022. Entitled “Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022,” the document unpacks what many of us have long known: that the jabs are death jabs, not healing jabs.
If you want to live, DON’T get jabbed for COVID
The worst month up until now for deaths occurring in the fully jabbed was January 2022, during which 3,914 COVID deaths were recorded among the fully jabbed compared to just 693 deaths among the unvaccinated. Comparatively, June 2021 saw the lowest number of fully jabbed deaths with just 224.
“However, the lowest number of deaths among the unvaccinated population occurred in May 2022, with 82 deaths,” explains The Exposé, which closely tracks ONS data.
“For context, the vaccinated population recorded 1,282 deaths during the same month. This means the vaccinated accounted for 94% of all Covid-19 deaths during the most recent month.”
All in all, there were 29,915 COVID deaths recorded in England between June 2021 and the end of May 2022. Of this, 25,280 deaths occurred in the fully jabbed population while the remaining 4,635 deaths occurred in the non-jabbed.
“This means the fully vaccinated population have accounted for 85% / 9 in every 10 Covid-19 deaths over the past twelve months,” The Exposé explains.
What is worse, the Winter 2022 “booster” shot campaign only made things worse. Instead of alleviating the huge number of deaths occurring among the fully jabbed, the boosters only increased the number of fully jabbed deaths.
“Overall, there were 15,113 Covid-19 deaths by 31st May 2022, and a shocking 13,666 of those deaths were among the vaccinated population,” The Exposé reports. “But what’s even more shocking than this is that 12,442 of those deaths were among the triple / quadruple vaccinated population.”
“This means the triple / quadruple vaccinated population have accounted for a frightening 91% of all Covid-19 deaths among the vaccinated since the beginning of 2022.”
The fourth “booster” shot that was released in the UK this past spring is only further driving the fully jabbed death rate. In short, the more COVID jabs a person takes, the greater his or her likelihood of succumbing to death by “COVID.”
Recognizing that the data shows all this, the ONS has become increasingly quieter with its data releases. One of the most recent data drops shows that 94 percent of all COVID deaths in April and May 2022 occurred in those who had taken all available COVID jabs.
“These aren’t the kind of figures you would expect to see if the Covid-19 injections really are up to 95% effective at preventing death, are they?” The Exposé asks. “With news like this being swept under the rug by the mainstream media, it makes you wonder what else you are not being told.”
In the comments at Natural News, one of our own added that all of this is why Pfizer wanted to hide its clinical trial data – or lack thereof – for many decades.
“They knew all along,” this person wrote. “And yes, the government was complicit. The jab never should have been released.”
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
++++++++++++++++++++
35,618,602 Victims Dead From the Covid-19 Vaccine. Is This a Genocide Yet?
Some VAERS URF philosophical debates…
Posted by WELCOMETHEEAGLE88
SEP 20, 2023
VAERSAware.com – WelcomeTheEagle88
This analysis is based on the VAERS Under Reporting Factor (URF) study known as the 2010 Harvard Pilgrim Study aka The Lazarus Report. It is very interesting that immediately after this study was published, CDC made a gargantuan change to VAERS where “Only primary/Initial reports are published”. It’s very important to understand this Harvard Pilgrim Study did not have to contend with this paradigm shift we deal with today. What’s worse, it seems like most of our so called experts do not even recognize this paradigm shift even exists?
I want to be exact as I can on what this actually means and what the VAERS system was doing prior to 2011 with respects to adding follow-up data. Exactly speaking VAERS would append follow-up data to initial reports. They would NOT delete initial reports to add or create a new appended report with a different VAERS ID#. I will mention that Dr. Jessica Rose in her Oct 2021 Critical Appraisal of VAERS Pharmacovigilance – IPAK paper seems to believe that VAERS deletes reports to then add new info/report when a victim subsequently dies? I don’t know if she still feels this way or if I even understand here paper correctly? I did a critical appraisal of her critical appraisal here, just click the image [Blog Editor: Probably because Substack does not embed Bitchute, the video link was embedded in the photo. Other than my Substack page, I’m embedding the video itself]:
Photo to VIDEO: THE EAGLE’S CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF A VAERS CRITICAL APPRAISAL
Bitchute VIDEO: THE EAGLE’S CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF A VAERS CRITICAL APPRAISAL – IRON SHARPENS IRON
[Posted by welcometheeagle88
First Published June 16th, 2022 23:32 UTC
So any who, here is the up close print where CDC tells us five times that only initial reports are published, contrary to Dr. Rose’s opinion.
I wonder how many victims are now since DEAD, but were alive when reports were submitted? How many reports started out as Office Visit or Emergency, but are now a seemingly permanent disabilities in reality? I know many people in react19.org who would now like their reports upgraded to serious or permanent. God bless them but that won’t happen. It’s super super rare.
So what do you think, do you think we can take the almost 18K dead and double the count based the information available? Do you think any hospital CEO’s got a Fauci memo stating if you must file a VAERS report, at least make sure the victim has a heartbeat when you hit the submit button? Brain dead people are still alive so you don’t need to report them dead anyways.
I have also studied the pre-2011 VAERS reports and explained the data “addendum” process here.:
VAERS biggest paradigm shift in 2011 everyone missed!
WELCOMETHEEAGLE88 · APR 13
Substack ScreenGrab to “VAERS biggest paradigm shift in 2011 everyone missed!”
I probably said this in one hundred of my five hundred Bitchute videos, but who’s counting? I guess I will bury this factoid here and wait for a celebrity analyst freedom fighter to catch on. So check out blurb #4: “Since January 2011, only primary reports are included in the data.” — Read full story
Doubling the death stats, based on the paradigm shift of 2011 is still conservative even before we begin attempting to calculate a URF for the following reasons.
1. There is still about ~50 clearly dead victims per the summary narrative, because the “died” box is not checked off. See Here.
2. There is at least 100-150 Covid vax deaths in the UNKNOWN VAX TYPE. The clue is in the lot# and/or the summary narrative.
3. The bundled deaths on one report. There is as many 1,500-2,000 more deaths if we could ethically unbundle.
4. ~1,400 fetal demise, stillborns, spontaneous aborts, etc.. but NOT classified as death. Kids in the womb is a big debate, kids out the vag canal for a month are struggling to be counted as a person, and pretty soon you might not be counted as a person if you haven’t grown pubic hairs or hair on your chest. Seems like they want to abort everybody?
VAERS Data 9/8/23 (Table 2)
5. By CDC’s own admission VAERS had received 19,476 DEATH reports by March 1, 2023 when they stopped making these alerts:
VAERS Data 9/823 (Table 3)
Conclusions:
I conservatively doubled Kirsch’s 41x for all the reasons listed above but for shits and giggles (nobody is laughing) let’s extrapolate this 19,476 deaths up to March 1.
What if we apply a URF of 88x instead of 82x to 19,476 CDC’s March 1st benchmark? From here forward I want the world to know this as The Eagle’s URF based on doubling Kirsch’s URF and adding a few points to compensate for the Tom Foolery the troglodytes at CDC are pulling with these Vegas card tricks.
41,456,009 Extrapolated VAERS Dead
God Bless. Please support The Eagle!
© 2023 WelcomeTheEagle88
VAERSAware.com – WelcomeTheEagle88 HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT VAERSAware.com – WelcomeTheEagle88
The Conservative-Patriot Christian Right 
